-
Product Teams should set realistic aims so UX simulations can help identify what needs to be improved in their interfaces and serve as a discussion starting point.
-
“100 simulations?! Isn’t that a bit… excessive?” In the past, yes, it might have been.
-
Simulations are limited, they are not a drop in replacement for real human users. But they have many unique advantages.
-
If testing a user journey is as easy as a prompt, there is no excuse for no evidence in UX, even at the beginning. Simulations are no replacement for human feedback; they are a useful stand-in when you otherwise have nothing and a bar raiser for all too seldom speaking occasions. AI simulations address: access…
-
AI user testing identifies UX issues before human testing but a specific, actionable prompt is critical to achieve real insights. ‘Good’ Velocity prompts will constrain a simulation with specific testing goals for your design. Constraints are key since Velocity AI isn’t thinking; it is acting on what looks most likely based on patterns from millions…